CO129-142 - Public Offices & Others - 1869 — Page 35

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

face of those negotiations

1859

it was hardly to be expected that the Attorney General - the only legal officer of the colony - would be put in motion to obtain convictions

was not put in the Supreme Court. In fact he certainly was not during the three eventful years 1856-1859 of my Attorney-Generalship. The judgment alluded to was given by the Supreme Court in a civil suit between private litigants.

Who

-1859

The Ordinance could not be properly enforced by the authorities whom it purported to empower to do so:

For penal provisions or all that it did was to exact testimony against any person, who should

"For gain or lucre keep any room or place, boat, vessel, or any place on land or water, for public playing or gambling, or permit any person within such house etc. to play it." (which excluded the partner engaged almost at (0.3.))

And the person appearing as master or having the care or management of such house etc., should be liable to the penalty thereby, and should dis... the absent owner, occupier, and "Keeper" thereby; (which again excluded the absent owner occupier, and even the absent "Keeper" - nay more, excluded the owner, occupier, and "Keeper" unless proved to be actually managing or appearing to manage)

It is true that the only remaining section was intended to fix the mesh partners themselves within

33

A

but the intention certainly failed for lack of precision of language. That section, if it meant anything at all, enacted (1.2.)

"That any person who should use or haunt, or be found in any such house etc. should be liable..." remarkable for not designating a "gambling house", nor saying "when gambling was going on" or at what "time" was...

so that this prohibition, if literally carried into effect, would have taken in not merely the gambler, innocent occupiers, visitors, servants - all in short, who might be found in any house etc. in the colony, from Government House to the meanest...

The repeated miscarriages of informations under that Ordinance were brought to the notice of the Police...

Edit History

2026-05-20 10:33:19 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
face of those negotiations 1859 it was hardly to be expected that the Attorney General - the only legal officer of the colony - would be put in motion to obtain convictions was not put in the Supreme Court. In fact he certainly was not during the three eventful years 1856-1859 of my Attorney-Generalship. The judgment alluded to was given by the Supreme Court in a civil suit between private litigants. Who -1859 The Ordinance could not be properly enforced by the authorities whom it purported to empower to do so: For penal provisions or all that it did was to exact testimony against any person, who should "For gain or lucre keep any room or place, boat, vessel, or any place on land or water, for public playing or gambling, or permit any person within such house etc. to play it." (which excluded the partner engaged almost at (0.3.)) And the person appearing as master or having the care or management of such house etc., should be liable to the penalty thereby, and should dis... the absent owner, occupier, and "Keeper" thereby; (which again excluded the absent owner occupier, and even the absent "Keeper" - nay more, excluded the owner, occupier, and "Keeper" unless proved to be actually managing or appearing to manage) It is true that the only remaining section was intended to fix the mesh partners themselves within 33 A but the intention certainly failed for lack of precision of language. That section, if it meant anything at all, enacted (1.2.) "That any person who should use or haunt, or be found in any such house etc. should be liable..." remarkable for not designating a "gambling house", nor saying "when gambling was going on" or at what "time" was... so that this prohibition, if literally carried into effect, would have taken in not merely the gambler, innocent occupiers, visitors, servants - all in short, who might be found in any house etc. in the colony, from Government House to the meanest... The repeated miscarriages of informations under that Ordinance were brought to the notice of the Police...
Baseline (Original)
face of those negotiations 1859 it was hardly to be expected weat the Attorney General - the only gear fueror of the chory - would be put in motion to obtain convections was not puter in the Supreme Court. In fact be certainly motion during the there eventful years 1856-1 of my Attomingsesiccalship. The judgment alluded to given by the Supreme Court in a civil suist beteren private litigants. Who -1859 The Ordinance could not The provisions of properly enforced by the authorities whom it purported to empower to do so:_ penal For or all that it did was to exc ragainst any person, who should "For gain or to exact testainmony should (0.1.) honal luere Kut any " room or place, boat, vesel, or any place on taur water, for public playing or gam "bling, or permit any person within buck house ste. to play it." (which excluded the panter engaged almost at (0.3.) And or acting as The person appearing master or having the case or terble uy any wich house ke, Ohould be tutem to the "Kacper therety, n and should dis the absent "such to the penalty aprecard;" (which again excluded the absent owner occupier, and even the absent "Keeper" -ney more, Mexcluded owner, occupier, and super, becny print, not assad proved to be actually mening if appearing to managed It is time that the only remaining section was intended to fun the mesh parters themselves within 33 A but the intention certainly failed of langues. That for lack of precision section, if it meant anyther at all, exacted (1.2.) "That any person who "should use omething haunt, or be found in any such honay er should be lettervine heemarkable mianti the designation of doubling house, nor saying "when gambling was going "time" was нем what.. tes that this prohibition, if literally but the carried into effect, would have taken. in not merely the gambler, innocent recupeers, visitors, servants all in short, who might "se hacente in " he found in " " any house etc. in the colony, from govemment House to the meanest ار تن انسان کو اس کی The repented mixcarriges of informations under hought to the vecines Police that ormance were F *
2026-05-20 10:33:19 · Baseline
View content

face of those negotiations

1859

it was hardly to be expected weat the Attorney General - the only gear fueror of the chory - would be put in motion to obtain convections

was not puter in the Supreme Court. In fact be certainly motion during the there eventful years 1856-1 of my Attomingsesiccalship. The judgment alluded to given by the Supreme Court in a civil suist beteren private litigants.

Who

-1859

The Ordinance could not The provisions of properly enforced by the authorities whom it purported to empower to do so:_

penal

For

or all that it did was to exc

ragainst any person, who should

"For gain or

to exact testainmony

should (0.1.)

honal

luere Kut any

" room or place, boat, vesel, or any place on

taur

water, for public playing or gam

"bling, or permit any

person within

buck

house ste. to play it." (which excluded the panter engaged almost at (0.3.)

And

or acting as The person appearing master or having the case or

terble

uy any wich house ke, Ohould be tutem to the "Kacper therety,

n

and should dis

the absent

"such to the penalty aprecard;" (which again excluded the absent owner occupier,

and even the absent "Keeper" -ney more,

Mexcluded

owner, occupier, and super, becny print, not assad proved to be actually mening

if

appearing to managed

It is time that the only remaining

section was intended to fun the mesh

parters themselves within

33

A

but the intention certainly failed

of langues. That

for lack of precision

section, if it meant anyther at all, exacted (1.2.)

"That any person who "should use omething haunt, or be found in any such honay

er

should be lettervine heemarkable

mianti the designation of doubling house, nor saying "when gambling was going

"time" was

нем

what..

tes that this prohibition, if literally

but the carried into effect, would have taken. in not merely the gambler, innocent recupeers, visitors, servants all in short, who might "se hacente in " he found in " " any house etc. in the colony, from govemment House to the meanest

ار تن انسان کو اس کی

The repented mixcarriges of informations under hought to the vecines Police

that ormance were

F

*

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.